Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.ruby > #7253
| From | Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.ruby |
| Subject | Re: Curious about some comments I received on some of my code |
| Date | 2016-05-21 22:01 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <dqbt51F2g7cU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <bfc6c044-e8ff-436d-af00-038742e45c3f@googlegroups.com> |
On 18.05.2016 11:23, ngw@nofeed.org wrote: > They told me that "The feedback from the team showed that the tests > provided complete coverage, however the code had a few issue > regarding naming and organising and contained quite a few clusters of > functionality in a few lines." I find that way too unspecific to comment. What is this supposed to mean? If they have something to complain about they should address specific items - if only that you can learn from it. > Also consider I'm not a native english speaker. > What you guys think? Maybe it's because I opened Fixnum?... That method should have gone into Integer if at all. Kind regards robert -- remember.guy do |as, often| as.you_can - without end http://blog.rubybestpractices.com/
Back to comp.lang.ruby | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Curious about some comments I received on some of my code ngw@nofeed.org - 2016-05-18 02:23 -0700 Re: Curious about some comments I received on some of my code Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2016-05-21 22:01 +0200 Re: Curious about some comments I received on some of my code "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2016-07-23 23:43 +0000
csiph-web