Re: functional languages -- any recommendations?

X-FeedAbuse	http://nntpfeed.proxad.net/abuse.pl feeded by 88.191.16.109
Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.dougwise.org!nntpfeed.proxad.net!nospam.fr.eu.org!talisker.lacave.net!lacave.net!not-for-mail
From	7stud -- <bbxx789_05ss@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.ruby
Subject	Re: functional languages -- any recommendations?
Date	Wed, 6 Apr 2011 19:30:57 -0500
Organization	Service de news de lacave.net
Lines	11
Message-ID	<b2b42284e0ea1a16e2e15b6f451141bd@ruby-forum.com> (permalink)
References	<e5d09644917d0fada5c50cf47289944f@ruby-forum.com> <874o6bmg0i.fsf@gondolin.draga.com> <BANLkTi=dPqmrWVPjkiS+MYBmA6_0crPjaA@mail.gmail.com> <20110406200840.70391c08@fractal>
NNTP-Posting-Host	bristol.highgroove.com
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Trace	talisker.lacave.net 1302136279 61632 65.111.164.187 (7 Apr 2011 00:31:19 GMT)
X-Complaints-To	abuse@lacave.net
NNTP-Posting-Date	Thu, 7 Apr 2011 00:31:19 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To	<20110406200840.70391c08@fractal>
X-Received-From	This message has been automatically forwarded from the ruby-talk mailing list by a gateway at comp.lang.ruby. If it is SPAM, it did not originate at comp.lang.ruby. Please report the original sender, and not us. Thanks! For more details about this gateway, please visit: http://blog.grayproductions.net/categories/the_gateway
X-Mail-Count	381083
X-Ml-Name	ruby-talk
X-Rubymirror	Yes
X-Ruby-Talk	<b2b42284e0ea1a16e2e15b6f451141bd@ruby-forum.com>
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.ruby:2422

Show key headers only | View raw

Johnny M. wrote in post #991283:
>
> And as I said my personal opinion is that haskell = hard.
>

I made it to chapter 5 of Real World Haskell before drowning in a real 
world JSON example.

-- 
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Back to comp.lang.ruby | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

functional languages -- any recommendations? 7stud -- <bbxx789_05ss@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-04 20:17 -0500
  Re: functional languages -- any recommendations? Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@gmail.com> - 2011-04-04 22:37 -0500
  Re: functional languages -- any recommendations? Phillip Gawlowski <cmdjackryan@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-05 00:29 -0500
  Re: functional languages -- any recommendations? Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@medioh.com> - 2011-04-05 00:47 -0500
    Re: functional languages -- any recommendations? Peter Hickman <peterhickman386@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-05 03:47 -0500
  Re: functional languages -- any recommendations? Brian Candler <b.candler@pobox.com> - 2011-04-05 03:54 -0500
  Re: functional languages -- any recommendations? Johnny Morrice <spoon@killersmurf.com> - 2011-04-05 04:13 -0500
    Re: functional languages -- any recommendations? Johnny Morrice <spoon@killersmurf.com> - 2011-04-05 05:14 -0500
    Re: functional languages -- any recommendations? Brian Candler <b.candler@pobox.com> - 2011-04-05 07:43 -0500
      Re: functional languages -- any recommendations? Johnny Morrice <spoon@killersmurf.com> - 2011-04-05 08:09 -0500
        Re: functional languages -- any recommendations? Brian Candler <b.candler@pobox.com> - 2011-04-05 10:36 -0500
          Re: functional languages -- any recommendations? serialhex <serialhex@gmail.com> - 2011-04-05 11:21 -0500
          Re: functional languages -- any recommendations? Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@medioh.com> - 2011-04-05 12:30 -0500
  Re: functional languages -- any recommendations? serialhex <serialhex@gmail.com> - 2011-04-06 13:04 -0500
    Re: functional languages -- any recommendations? Johnny Morrice <spoon@killersmurf.com> - 2011-04-06 14:08 -0500
      Re: functional languages -- any recommendations? 7stud -- <bbxx789_05ss@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-06 19:30 -0500

csiph-web