Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.ruby > #2337
| From | Johnny Morrice <spoon@killersmurf.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.ruby |
| Subject | Re: functional languages -- any recommendations? |
| Date | 2011-04-05 08:09 -0500 |
| Organization | Service de news de lacave.net |
| Message-ID | <20110405140930.02946183@fractal> (permalink) |
| References | <e5d09644917d0fada5c50cf47289944f@ruby-forum.com> <20110405101339.52fe20a5@fractal> <8fc6df58b77b681f2a9e1e7819be15ba@ruby-forum.com> |
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011 21:43:42 +0900 Brian Candler <b.candler@pobox.com> wrote: > You're probably thinking of "records", which are basically just named > offsets into a tuple. Hey yeah I was! > There are proper data structures too, such as "dict" which is > somewhat like a ruby Hash. I have should said I meant user defined data structures. > It can be a bit overwhelming at first having all the different > built-in types: tuple, list, binary (when you'd just use Array in > ruby) binary is not so unusual, kinda like bytestrings in python, or Haskell., Except in Haskell a bytestring is user defined rather than built in. > > I really like erlang though, the syntax is cool. Commas. > > It takes some grokking as to when you need a comma, when you need a > semicolon, and when you need a dot. Erlang has great semantics and > terrible syntax. Okay, I concede the point. I am utterly wrong. But I still enjoy the asthetics. It's sort of like a sentence in English.
Back to comp.lang.ruby | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
functional languages -- any recommendations? 7stud -- <bbxx789_05ss@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-04 20:17 -0500
Re: functional languages -- any recommendations? Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@gmail.com> - 2011-04-04 22:37 -0500
Re: functional languages -- any recommendations? Phillip Gawlowski <cmdjackryan@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-05 00:29 -0500
Re: functional languages -- any recommendations? Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@medioh.com> - 2011-04-05 00:47 -0500
Re: functional languages -- any recommendations? Peter Hickman <peterhickman386@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-05 03:47 -0500
Re: functional languages -- any recommendations? Brian Candler <b.candler@pobox.com> - 2011-04-05 03:54 -0500
Re: functional languages -- any recommendations? Johnny Morrice <spoon@killersmurf.com> - 2011-04-05 04:13 -0500
Re: functional languages -- any recommendations? Johnny Morrice <spoon@killersmurf.com> - 2011-04-05 05:14 -0500
Re: functional languages -- any recommendations? Brian Candler <b.candler@pobox.com> - 2011-04-05 07:43 -0500
Re: functional languages -- any recommendations? Johnny Morrice <spoon@killersmurf.com> - 2011-04-05 08:09 -0500
Re: functional languages -- any recommendations? Brian Candler <b.candler@pobox.com> - 2011-04-05 10:36 -0500
Re: functional languages -- any recommendations? serialhex <serialhex@gmail.com> - 2011-04-05 11:21 -0500
Re: functional languages -- any recommendations? Tony Arcieri <tony.arcieri@medioh.com> - 2011-04-05 12:30 -0500
Re: functional languages -- any recommendations? serialhex <serialhex@gmail.com> - 2011-04-06 13:04 -0500
Re: functional languages -- any recommendations? Johnny Morrice <spoon@killersmurf.com> - 2011-04-06 14:08 -0500
Re: functional languages -- any recommendations? 7stud -- <bbxx789_05ss@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-06 19:30 -0500
csiph-web