Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.ruby > #2917
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder2.enfer-du-nord.net!talisker.lacave.net!lacave.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Fearless Fool <r@alum.mit.edu> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.ruby |
| Subject | Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern |
| Date | Fri, 15 Apr 2011 01:27:08 -0500 |
| Organization | Service de news de lacave.net |
| Lines | 22 |
| Message-ID | <7c9986702d2a6acd3748e6cca228d8da@ruby-forum.com> (permalink) |
| References | <d0c168880ff1c65dd84fc6d70778ddb2@ruby-forum.com> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | bristol.highgroove.com |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Trace | talisker.lacave.net 1302849350 52712 65.111.164.187 (15 Apr 2011 06:35:50 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@lacave.net |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Fri, 15 Apr 2011 06:35:50 +0000 (UTC) |
| In-Reply-To | <d0c168880ff1c65dd84fc6d70778ddb2@ruby-forum.com> |
| X-Received-From | This message has been automatically forwarded from the ruby-talk mailing list by a gateway at comp.lang.ruby. If it is SPAM, it did not originate at comp.lang.ruby. Please report the original sender, and not us. Thanks! For more details about this gateway, please visit: http://blog.grayproductions.net/categories/the_gateway |
| X-Mail-Count | 381607 |
| X-Ml-Name | ruby-talk |
| X-Rubymirror | Yes |
| X-Ruby-Talk | <7c9986702d2a6acd3748e6cca228d8da@ruby-forum.com> |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.ruby:2917 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Fearless Fool wrote in post #992929:
> Maybe I'm overthinking this...
Meh. I s'pose I can substitute an underscore for a period:
my_obj.foo_some_method(*args)
.. whereupon this become a simple mixin on my_obj's class:
def foo_some_method(*args) {
MyClass.some_method(self, *args)
}
The only potential disadvantage is that I need to write one of these for
each method. The advantages include likely to run much faster (than
constructing lambdas or invoking method_missing processing) and possibly
easier to understand and maintain than what I was originally trying to
do.
--
Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.
Back to comp.lang.ruby | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
looking for an "inversion" pattern Fearless Fool <r@alum.mit.edu> - 2011-04-15 00:16 -0500
Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Fearless Fool <r@alum.mit.edu> - 2011-04-15 01:27 -0500
Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-15 04:24 -0500
Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Fearless Fool <r@alum.mit.edu> - 2011-04-15 10:40 -0500
Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-16 15:29 +0200
Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Kevin Mahler <kevin.mahler@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-15 02:14 -0500
Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Fearless Fool <r@alum.mit.edu> - 2011-04-15 02:43 -0500
Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Kevin Mahler <kevin.mahler@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-15 08:44 -0500
Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern 7stud -- <bbxx789_05ss@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-16 13:20 -0500
Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern 7stud -- <bbxx789_05ss@yahoo.com> - 2011-04-16 13:43 -0500
Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Jesús Gabriel y Galán <jgabrielygalan@gmail.com> - 2011-04-15 02:45 -0500
Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Brian Candler <b.candler@pobox.com> - 2011-04-16 16:14 -0500
Re: looking for an "inversion" pattern Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-04-16 23:40 +0200
csiph-web