Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #70382 > unrolled thread

Re: Why Python 3?

Started byAndrew Berg <aberg010@my.hennepintech.edu>
First post2014-04-19 08:10 -0500
Last post2014-04-19 08:10 -0500
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Why Python 3? Andrew Berg <aberg010@my.hennepintech.edu> - 2014-04-19 08:10 -0500

#70382 — Re: Why Python 3?

FromAndrew Berg <aberg010@my.hennepintech.edu>
Date2014-04-19 08:10 -0500
SubjectRe: Why Python 3?
Message-ID<mailman.9359.1397913053.18130.python-list@python.org>
On 2014.04.19 07:58, Ian Foote wrote:
> Django has been there since 1.5. My company has been using python3 in
> production since 1.6 was released. There have been a few other third
> party libraries we've wanted to use but can't, but we've been able to
> work around that.
I guess I'm a bit behind the times then. Last I checked, only certain parts of it were working on Python 3. Nice to hear that it fully
supports Python 3 now. :)

-- 
CPython 3.4.0 | Windows NT 6.2.9200 / FreeBSD 10.0

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web