Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #70382
| Date | 2014-04-19 08:10 -0500 |
|---|---|
| From | Andrew Berg <aberg010@my.hennepintech.edu> |
| Subject | Re: Why Python 3? |
| References | <CAJUMiQsdjw4oXVVthrOPTjzr19cpc8qw-vfPd3O8L-ShH6mc2g@mail.gmail.com> <53520052.8030407@my.hennepintech.edu> <5352730E.8080101@feete.org> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.9359.1397913053.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 2014.04.19 07:58, Ian Foote wrote: > Django has been there since 1.5. My company has been using python3 in > production since 1.6 was released. There have been a few other third > party libraries we've wanted to use but can't, but we've been able to > work around that. I guess I'm a bit behind the times then. Last I checked, only certain parts of it were working on Python 3. Nice to hear that it fully supports Python 3 now. :) -- CPython 3.4.0 | Windows NT 6.2.9200 / FreeBSD 10.0
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Why Python 3? Andrew Berg <aberg010@my.hennepintech.edu> - 2014-04-19 08:10 -0500
csiph-web