Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #106687 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-08 10:29 -0400 |
| Last post | 2016-04-08 10:29 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: how to convert code that uses cmp to python3 Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-04-08 10:29 -0400
| From | Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-08 10:29 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: how to convert code that uses cmp to python3 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.90.1460125759.2253.python-list@python.org> |
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016, at 10:08, Chris Angelico wrote: > seq1 == seq2 > seq1 < seq2 > > You only need ONE comparison, and the other is presumed to be its > opposite. When, in the Python 3 version, would you need to compare > twice? == might be just as expensive as the others, particularly if the sequences are unlikely to share object identity. I suspect he chose "s1 < s2; s2 < s1" precisely because someone suggested in another post on this thread to exclusively use the less-than operator on purity grounds.
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web