Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #106687
| From | Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: how to convert code that uses cmp to python3 |
| Date | 2016-04-08 10:29 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.90.1460125759.2253.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <57075F43.7060004@rece.vub.ac.be> <85fuuw5ypl.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <5707B2CE.1010407@rece.vub.ac.be> <CAPTjJmrMv5O5vwrbfHJJCdiHi87naPOanhPmk4Ba_SLRgu1m4Q@mail.gmail.com> <1460125750.1451220.572931817.3E46D651@webmail.messagingengine.com> |
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016, at 10:08, Chris Angelico wrote: > seq1 == seq2 > seq1 < seq2 > > You only need ONE comparison, and the other is presumed to be its > opposite. When, in the Python 3 version, would you need to compare > twice? == might be just as expensive as the others, particularly if the sequences are unlikely to share object identity. I suspect he chose "s1 < s2; s2 < s1" precisely because someone suggested in another post on this thread to exclusively use the less-than operator on purity grounds.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: how to convert code that uses cmp to python3 Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-04-08 10:29 -0400
csiph-web