Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #69791 > unrolled thread

threading

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

Contents

  threading Onder Hazaroglu <oxhazaroglu@ualr.edu> - 2014-04-06 21:54 -0500
    Re: threading Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-04-06 20:22 -0700

#69791 — threading

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hello,
I've been using threading library to run some experiments parallel. There is
no message passing between my threads but still it messes up somehow. The
results are different than running it separated. Basically I experiment with
three threads working on three different files but the results are different
than running three of them sequentially. Is there a way to make sure that
there is no memory sharing between threads?

-- 
Best Regards,

Onder HAZAROGLU | Graduate Student | Ph.D. Candidate
University of Arkansas at Little Rock | Computer Science Department
EIT Bldg. | (501) 615-3851 | oxhazaroglu@ualr.edu, onderhazaroglu@gmail.com

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#69793

On Monday, April 7, 2014 8:24:37 AM UTC+5:30, Onder Hazaroglu wrote:
> Hello,
> I've been using threading library to run some experiments parallel. There is
> no message passing between my threads but still it messes up somehow. The
> results are different than running it separated. Basically I experiment with
> three threads working on three different files but the results are different
> than running three of them sequentially. Is there a way to make sure that
> there is no memory sharing between threads?

Python -- like most languages -- does not provide the option:
thread-efficiency plus process-isolation.

Erlang makes this its centerpiece. So look at it if thats what you are
after.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python

csiph-web