Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #69793
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-04-06 20:22 -0700 |
| References | <mailman.8968.1396839306.18130.python-list@python.org> |
| Message-ID | <6a7cd37d-91e5-4e72-86c2-247b713e006c@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: threading |
| From | Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> |
On Monday, April 7, 2014 8:24:37 AM UTC+5:30, Onder Hazaroglu wrote: > Hello, > I've been using threading library to run some experiments parallel. There is > no message passing between my threads but still it messes up somehow. The > results are different than running it separated. Basically I experiment with > three threads working on three different files but the results are different > than running three of them sequentially. Is there a way to make sure that > there is no memory sharing between threads? Python -- like most languages -- does not provide the option: thread-efficiency plus process-isolation. Erlang makes this its centerpiece. So look at it if thats what you are after.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
threading Onder Hazaroglu <oxhazaroglu@ualr.edu> - 2014-04-06 21:54 -0500 Re: threading Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-04-06 20:22 -0700
csiph-web