Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #106961 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-13 13:05 -0400 |
| Last post | 2016-04-13 13:05 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: sum accuracy Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-04-13 13:05 -0400
| From | Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-13 13:05 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: sum accuracy |
| Message-ID | <mailman.85.1460567112.15650.python-list@python.org> |
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016, at 12:51, Robin Becker wrote: > Does anyone know if sum does anything special to try and improve > accuracy? My > simple tests seem to show it is exactly equivalent to a for loop > summation. No, it doesn't. Sum works on any type that can be added (except strings), it can't make any assumptions about the characteristics of floating point types. For non-numeric types, the addition operator may not be semantically commutative or associative. Look at http://code.activestate.com/recipes/393090-binary-floating-point-summation-accurate-to-full-p/ for an example of a more accurate algorithm, but note that, for example, this algorithm wouldn't work on complex numbers (you'd have to sum the real and imaginary components separately)
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web