Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #106961
| From | Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: sum accuracy |
| Date | 2016-04-13 13:05 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.85.1460567112.15650.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| References | <570E78F9.8050409@chamonix.reportlab.co.uk> <1460567110.3933817.577783969.165F6097@webmail.messagingengine.com> |
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016, at 12:51, Robin Becker wrote: > Does anyone know if sum does anything special to try and improve > accuracy? My > simple tests seem to show it is exactly equivalent to a for loop > summation. No, it doesn't. Sum works on any type that can be added (except strings), it can't make any assumptions about the characteristics of floating point types. For non-numeric types, the addition operator may not be semantically commutative or associative. Look at http://code.activestate.com/recipes/393090-binary-floating-point-summation-accurate-to-full-p/ for an example of a more accurate algorithm, but note that, for example, this algorithm wouldn't work on complex numbers (you'd have to sum the real and imaginary components separately)
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: sum accuracy Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2016-04-13 13:05 -0400
csiph-web