Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #97003 > unrolled thread

Re: sort help

Started byChris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
First post2015-09-23 08:55 +1000
Last post2015-09-23 08:55 +1000
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: sort help Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 08:55 +1000

#97003 — Re: sort help

FromChris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Date2015-09-23 08:55 +1000
SubjectRe: sort help
Message-ID<mailman.75.1442962527.28679.python-list@python.org>
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Larry Martell <larry.martell@gmail.com> wrote:
> I currently have 3 lists of lists and I sort them based on a common
> field into a single list like this:
>
>         def GetObjKey(a):
>             return a[2]
>
>         sorted(a + b + c, key=GetObjKey)
>
> Which works just fine.
>
> But now, I need to have just the first list (a) also sub sorted by
> another field and I can't quite figure out how to do this.

Have you tried simply sorting a by the other field prior to doing your
merge-and-sort? The Python list.sort() method is guaranteed to be
stable. I can't find a comparable guarantee for sorted(), but worst
case, you should be able to do your list merge, and then explicitly
name it and sort it.

ChrisA

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web