Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #97003
| References | <CACwCsY71moXc+72Y5CT6B2+_8d8cPNFyq7zG49STYWcZ5gfkEA@mail.gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-09-23 08:55 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: sort help |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.75.1442962527.28679.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 8:42 AM, Larry Martell <larry.martell@gmail.com> wrote: > I currently have 3 lists of lists and I sort them based on a common > field into a single list like this: > > def GetObjKey(a): > return a[2] > > sorted(a + b + c, key=GetObjKey) > > Which works just fine. > > But now, I need to have just the first list (a) also sub sorted by > another field and I can't quite figure out how to do this. Have you tried simply sorting a by the other field prior to doing your merge-and-sort? The Python list.sort() method is guaranteed to be stable. I can't find a comparable guarantee for sorted(), but worst case, you should be able to do your list merge, and then explicitly name it and sort it. ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: sort help Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-09-23 08:55 +1000
csiph-web