Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #94000 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2015-07-17 05:47 -0400 |
| Last post | 2015-07-17 05:47 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Proposed keyword to transfer control to another function Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2015-07-17 05:47 -0400
| From | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-07-17 05:47 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Proposed keyword to transfer control to another function |
| Message-ID | <mailman.637.1437126496.3674.python-list@python.org> |
On 7/17/2015 3:17 AM, Antoon Pardon wrote: > On 07/17/2015 01:46 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: >> Open for bikeshedding: What should the keyword be? We can't use >> "exec", which would match Unix and shell usage, because it's already >> used in a rather different sense in Python. Current candidates: >> "transfer", "goto", "recurse", and anything else you suggest. > > I propose the combination "return from". Much better. I believe 'yield from' actually cuts out the middle frame containing yield from. -- Terry Jan Reedy
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web