Re: Proposed keyword to transfer control to another function

From	Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
Subject	Re: Proposed keyword to transfer control to another function
Date	2015-07-17 05:47 -0400
References	<CAPTjJmq7_sG+HmMCBPWq2A3GQFPix-OjUTCu+yAmWiJmEFy6PA@mail.gmail.com> <55A8AC13.8070803@rece.vub.ac.be>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.637.1437126496.3674.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On 7/17/2015 3:17 AM, Antoon Pardon wrote:
> On 07/17/2015 01:46 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> Open for bikeshedding: What should the keyword be? We can't use
>> "exec", which would match Unix and shell usage, because it's already
>> used in a rather different sense in Python. Current candidates:
>> "transfer", "goto", "recurse", and anything else you suggest.
>
> I propose the combination "return from".

Much better.  I believe 'yield from' actually cuts out the middle frame
containing yield from.


-- 
Terry Jan Reedy

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Proposed keyword to transfer control to another function Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2015-07-17 05:47 -0400

csiph-web