Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #20239 > unrolled thread

Re: Python usage numbers

Started byAndrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com>
First post2012-02-11 15:51 -0600
Last post2012-02-11 15:51 -0600
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Python usage numbers Andrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com> - 2012-02-11 15:51 -0600

#20239 — Re: Python usage numbers

FromAndrew Berg <bahamutzero8825@gmail.com>
Date2012-02-11 15:51 -0600
SubjectRe: Python usage numbers
Message-ID<mailman.5708.1328997127.27778.python-list@python.org>
On 2/11/2012 3:02 PM, Eric Snow wrote:
> I'm thinking about this partly because of the discussion on
> python-ideas about the perceived challenges of Unicode in Python 3.

> For instance, if frameworks (like django and numpy) could completely
> hide the arguable challenges of Unicode in Python 3--and most projects
> were built on top of frameworks--then general efforts for making
> Unicode easier in Python 3 should go toward helping framework writers.
Huh? I'll admit I'm a novice, but isn't Unicode mostly trivial in py3k
compared to 2.x? Or are you referring to porting 2.x to 3.x? I've been
under the impression that Unicode in 2.x can be painful at times, but
easy in 3.x.
I've been using 3.2 and Unicode hasn't been much of an issue.
-- 
CPython 3.2.2 | Windows NT 6.1.7601.17640

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web