Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #96599 > unrolled thread

Re: [Datetime-SIG] Are there any "correct" implementations of tzinfo?

Started byRandom832 <random832@fastmail.com>
First post2015-09-14 16:10 -0400
Last post2015-09-14 16:10 -0400
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [Datetime-SIG] Are there any "correct" implementations of tzinfo? Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2015-09-14 16:10 -0400

#96599 — Re: [Datetime-SIG] Are there any "correct" implementations of tzinfo?

FromRandom832 <random832@fastmail.com>
Date2015-09-14 16:10 -0400
SubjectRe: [Datetime-SIG] Are there any "correct" implementations of tzinfo?
Message-ID<mailman.563.1442261441.8327.python-list@python.org>
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015, at 16:01, Carl Meyer wrote:
> Can we please stop cross-posting this thread to python-list and move it
> to datetime-sig only? I think anyone here on python-list who is
> sufficiently interested in it can subscribe to datetime-sig.
> 
> Or the other way around, whatever. I'd just like to stop getting all the
> messages twice.

Er, sorry. To compound the issue, i've also had problems with some of my
replies accidentally only going to python-list due to my email client
having a "reply list" button that identifies python-list as the primary.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web