Re: [Datetime-SIG] Are there any "correct" implementations of tzinfo?

From	Random832 <random832@fastmail.com>
References	(12 earlier) <CAExdVNn2wM8YW=Jg=aM86X6RaaVYPTioTSJ2d1gGp0k76CN3mg@mail.gmail.com> <1442257996.253100.383441705.7A0986C7@webmail.messagingengine.com> <CAExdVN=s_V_uz9mSOtp6b6+fKjqLZHArXKUQ-ty5EYkLM5V2qw@mail.gmail.com> <1442260714.263025.383475777.4728D768@webmail.messagingengine.com> <55F72793.1030702@oddbird.net>
Subject	Re: [Datetime-SIG] Are there any "correct" implementations of tzinfo?
Date	2015-09-14 16:10 -0400
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.563.1442261441.8327.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015, at 16:01, Carl Meyer wrote:
> Can we please stop cross-posting this thread to python-list and move it
> to datetime-sig only? I think anyone here on python-list who is
> sufficiently interested in it can subscribe to datetime-sig.
> 
> Or the other way around, whatever. I'd just like to stop getting all the
> messages twice.

Er, sorry. To compound the issue, i've also had problems with some of my
replies accidentally only going to python-list due to my email client
having a "reply list" button that identifies python-list as the primary.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: [Datetime-SIG] Are there any "correct" implementations of tzinfo? Random832 <random832@fastmail.com> - 2015-09-14 16:10 -0400

csiph-web