Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #63833 > unrolled thread

Re: proposal: bring nonlocal to py2.x

Started byMark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
First post2014-01-13 15:33 +0000
Last post2014-01-13 15:33 +0000
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: proposal: bring nonlocal to py2.x Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-01-13 15:33 +0000

#63833 — Re: proposal: bring nonlocal to py2.x

FromMark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
Date2014-01-13 15:33 +0000
SubjectRe: proposal: bring nonlocal to py2.x
Message-ID<mailman.5409.1389627248.18130.python-list@python.org>
On 13/01/2014 15:28, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>> But it could theoretically happen if Neal wants it so badly that he raises
>> an issue on the bug tracker against Python 2.7, finds all the relevant
>> source code in Python 3, back ports it, modifies all the relevant docs and
>> unit tests, then finds some warm hearted person to commit the changes.  Five
>> minute job.  Simples :)
>
> It's even worse than that, because adding 'nonlocal' is not a bugfix.
> So to be committed to the repo, it has to be approved for either 2.7
> branch (which is in bugfix-only maintenance mode) or 2.8 branch (which
> does not exist). Good luck. :)
>
> ChrisA
>

Then target the 2.8 fork that will take place if there's no agreement 
over PEP 460.  Still a five minute job, still simples :)

-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask 
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web