Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #63833
| From | Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: proposal: bring nonlocal to py2.x |
| Date | 2014-01-13 15:33 +0000 |
| References | <lb0ua4$fmj$1@ger.gmane.org> <CAFYqXL9UTE-2tMpUO313rKgt8vaH1UVnMA=RieuNTHUUUbW2Aw@mail.gmail.com> <lb10e5$d1i$1@ger.gmane.org> <CAPTjJmo_ZD1mMvikx8XjofgfwhDFZrbaXeM2q42-EKR1kFs-Jg@mail.gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5409.1389627248.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 13/01/2014 15:28, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 2:24 AM, Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: >> But it could theoretically happen if Neal wants it so badly that he raises >> an issue on the bug tracker against Python 2.7, finds all the relevant >> source code in Python 3, back ports it, modifies all the relevant docs and >> unit tests, then finds some warm hearted person to commit the changes. Five >> minute job. Simples :) > > It's even worse than that, because adding 'nonlocal' is not a bugfix. > So to be committed to the repo, it has to be approved for either 2.7 > branch (which is in bugfix-only maintenance mode) or 2.8 branch (which > does not exist). Good luck. :) > > ChrisA > Then target the 2.8 fork that will take place if there's no agreement over PEP 460. Still a five minute job, still simples :) -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: proposal: bring nonlocal to py2.x Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-01-13 15:33 +0000
csiph-web