Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #63663 > unrolled thread

Re: Porting mailing list underused?

Started bySkip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com>
First post2014-01-10 14:38 -0600
Last post2014-01-10 14:38 -0600
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Porting mailing list underused? Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2014-01-10 14:38 -0600

#63663 — Re: Porting mailing list underused?

FromSkip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com>
Date2014-01-10 14:38 -0600
SubjectRe: Porting mailing list underused?
Message-ID<mailman.5303.1389386312.18130.python-list@python.org>
> Anyone in the
> know who can explain this phenomenon?

I don't think I can explain it authoritatively, but I can hazard a
guess. Skimming the archives sorted by author, it looks like most/all
the correspondents are Python core developers. That leads me to
believe this was a list created for the core Python developers to
discuss issues related to porting tools such as 2to3 or six. I doubt
it was intended for Python programmers to get help porting their own
code. From the Python core development perspective, I think automated
porting tools are likely pretty mature at this point and don't warrant
a lot of discussion.

Skip

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web