Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #63663

Re: Porting mailing list underused?

References <lapl6t$aj6$1@ger.gmane.org>
Date 2014-01-10 14:38 -0600
Subject Re: Porting mailing list underused?
From Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.5303.1389386312.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


> Anyone in the
> know who can explain this phenomenon?

I don't think I can explain it authoritatively, but I can hazard a
guess. Skimming the archives sorted by author, it looks like most/all
the correspondents are Python core developers. That leads me to
believe this was a list created for the core Python developers to
discuss issues related to porting tools such as 2to3 or six. I doubt
it was intended for Python programmers to get help porting their own
code. From the Python core development perspective, I think automated
porting tools are likely pretty mature at this point and don't warrant
a lot of discussion.

Skip

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Porting mailing list underused? Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2014-01-10 14:38 -0600

csiph-web