Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #51489 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Devyn Collier Johnson <devyncjohnson@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-07-29 16:23 -0400 |
| Last post | 2013-07-29 16:23 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: import syntax Devyn Collier Johnson <devyncjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-07-29 16:23 -0400
| From | Devyn Collier Johnson <devyncjohnson@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-07-29 16:23 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: import syntax |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5264.1375129414.3114.python-list@python.org> |
On 07/29/2013 04:20 PM, Tim Chase wrote: > On 2013-07-29 16:09, Dave Angel wrote: >> On 07/29/2013 03:48 PM, Devyn Collier Johnson wrote: >>> The PEP8 recommends importing like this: >>> >>> import os >>> import re >>> >>> not like this: >>> >>> import os, re >> I got a bit further, and if I'm only using a couple of functions >> from the import, I'll list them in the comment. > If I just plan to use a small subset, I tend to reach for the > > from sys import stdout, stderr, exit > > sort of syntax. I find it makes my code read a bit more cleanly than > having to type "sys.stderr.write(...)" everywhere but is still pretty > readable. > > -tkc > > So, there are no advantages or disadvantages when disregarding readability? DCJ
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web