Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #51489

Re: import syntax

Date 2013-07-29 16:23 -0400
From Devyn Collier Johnson <devyncjohnson@gmail.com>
Subject Re: import syntax
References <51F6C720.2020404@Gmail.com> <kt6i57$2ku$1@ger.gmane.org> <20130729152051.46003bcf@bigbox.christie.dr>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.5264.1375129414.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On 07/29/2013 04:20 PM, Tim Chase wrote:
> On 2013-07-29 16:09, Dave Angel wrote:
>> On 07/29/2013 03:48 PM, Devyn Collier Johnson wrote:
>>> The PEP8 recommends importing like this:
>>>
>>> import os
>>> import re
>>>
>>> not like this:
>>>
>>> import os, re
>> I got a bit further, and if I'm only using a couple of functions
>> from the import, I'll list them in the comment.
> If I just plan to use a small subset, I tend to reach for the
>
>    from sys import stdout, stderr, exit
>
> sort of syntax.  I find it makes my code read a bit more cleanly than
> having to type "sys.stderr.write(...)" everywhere but is still pretty
> readable.
>
> -tkc
>
>
So, there are no advantages or disadvantages when disregarding readability?

DCJ

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: import syntax Devyn Collier Johnson <devyncjohnson@gmail.com> - 2013-07-29 16:23 -0400

csiph-web