Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #63296 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-01-07 03:36 +1100 |
| Last post | 2014-01-07 03:36 +1100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3" Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-01-07 03:36 +1100
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-07 03:36 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3" |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5028.1389026215.18130.python-list@python.org> |
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis@pitrou.net> wrote: > People don't use? According to available figures, there are more downloads of > Python 3 than downloads of Python 2 (Windows installers, mostly): > http://www.python.org/webstats/ > Unfortunately, that has a massive inherent bias, because there are Python builds available in most Linux distributions - and stats from those (like Debian's popcon) will be nearly as useless, because a lot of them will install one or the other (probably 2.x) without waiting for the user (so either they'll skew in favour of the one installed, or in favour of the one NOT installed, because that's the only one that'll be explicitly requested). It's probably fairly accurate for Windows stats, though, since most people who want Python on Windows are going to come to python.org for an installer. ChrisA
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web