Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #63296
| References | <lablra$1mc$2@ger.gmane.org> <labmaj$8u2$1@ger.gmane.org> <lad05k$gf6$1@ger.gmane.org> <loom.20140106T171406-519@post.gmane.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-01-07 03:36 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3" |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.5028.1389026215.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 3:29 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis@pitrou.net> wrote: > People don't use? According to available figures, there are more downloads of > Python 3 than downloads of Python 2 (Windows installers, mostly): > http://www.python.org/webstats/ > Unfortunately, that has a massive inherent bias, because there are Python builds available in most Linux distributions - and stats from those (like Debian's popcon) will be nearly as useless, because a lot of them will install one or the other (probably 2.x) without waiting for the user (so either they'll skew in favour of the one installed, or in favour of the one NOT installed, because that's the only one that'll be explicitly requested). It's probably fairly accurate for Windows stats, though, since most people who want Python on Windows are going to come to python.org for an installer. ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3" Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-01-07 03:36 +1100
csiph-web