Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #49479 > unrolled thread

Re: Stupid ways to spell simple code

Started byJoshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com>
First post2013-06-30 07:46 +0100
Last post2013-06-30 07:46 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Stupid ways to spell simple code Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-06-30 07:46 +0100

#49479 — Re: Stupid ways to spell simple code

FromJoshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com>
Date2013-06-30 07:46 +0100
SubjectRe: Stupid ways to spell simple code
Message-ID<mailman.4024.1372574848.3114.python-list@python.org>
On 30 June 2013 07:06, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:
> There's a bit of a discussion on python-ideas that includes a function
> that raises StopIteration. It inspired me to do something stupid, just
> to see how easily I could do it...
>
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> wrote:
> Re: [Python-ideas] "Iteration stopping" syntax
>>>>> def stop():
>> ...     raise StopIteration
>
> Here's a much more insane way to spell that:
>
> stop = (lambda: 0 and (yield 1))().__next__
>
> So, here's a challenge: Come up with something really simple, and
> write an insanely complicated - yet perfectly valid - way to achieve
> the same thing. Bonus points for horribly abusing Python's clean
> syntax in the process.
>
> Go on, do your worst!

You'll have to excuse me -- I'm writing a library to do just that.
I'll be done in a few weeks.

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web