Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #49479
| References | <CAPTjJmpmYZ3PG1Eoi3DYk1TYWHqZT222vue889=LnU687wTwcA@mail.gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| From | Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> |
| Date | 2013-06-30 07:46 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Stupid ways to spell simple code |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4024.1372574848.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 30 June 2013 07:06, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote: > There's a bit of a discussion on python-ideas that includes a function > that raises StopIteration. It inspired me to do something stupid, just > to see how easily I could do it... > > On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com> wrote: > Re: [Python-ideas] "Iteration stopping" syntax >>>>> def stop(): >> ... raise StopIteration > > Here's a much more insane way to spell that: > > stop = (lambda: 0 and (yield 1))().__next__ > > So, here's a challenge: Come up with something really simple, and > write an insanely complicated - yet perfectly valid - way to achieve > the same thing. Bonus points for horribly abusing Python's clean > syntax in the process. > > Go on, do your worst! You'll have to excuse me -- I'm writing a library to do just that. I'll be done in a few weeks.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Stupid ways to spell simple code Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws@gmail.com> - 2013-06-30 07:46 +0100
csiph-web