Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #107424 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Alan Evangelista <alanoe@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-20 16:54 -0300 |
| Last post | 2016-04-20 16:54 -0300 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: PEP proposal: sequence expansion support for yield statement: yield * Alan Evangelista <alanoe@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-04-20 16:54 -0300
| From | Alan Evangelista <alanoe@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-20 16:54 -0300 |
| Subject | Re: PEP proposal: sequence expansion support for yield statement: yield * |
| Message-ID | <mailman.39.1461182700.12923.python-list@python.org> |
> Currently the common pattern for yielding the elements in a sequence is as follows: > > for x in sequence: yield x > > I propose the following replacement (the result would be identical): > > yield *sequence imho the current syntax is much more intuitive, it is obvious to infer what it does by looking at it. I favor a more intuitive syntax over a more concise one. Regards, Alan Evangelista
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web