Re: PEP proposal: sequence expansion support for yield statement: yield *

From	Alan Evangelista <alanoe@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Subject	Re: PEP proposal: sequence expansion support for yield statement: yield *
Date	2016-04-20 16:54 -0300
Message-ID	<mailman.39.1461182700.12923.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References	<573e61523bfc412ca8674b06d70f2fd7@sraex01sc.sisa.samsung.com> <5717DE88.4070807@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Show all headers | View raw

> Currently the common pattern for yielding the elements in a sequence is as follows:
>
>    for x in sequence: yield x
>
> I propose the following replacement (the result would be identical):
>
>    yield *sequence

imho the current syntax is much more intuitive, it is obvious to infer what it does
by looking at it. I favor a more intuitive syntax over a more concise one.


Regards,
Alan Evangelista

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: PEP proposal: sequence expansion support for yield statement: yield * Alan Evangelista <alanoe@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-04-20 16:54 -0300

csiph-web