Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #61198 > unrolled thread

Re: One liners

Started byMichael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com>
First post2013-12-06 17:10 -0700
Last post2013-12-06 17:10 -0700
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: One liners Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-12-06 17:10 -0700

#61198 — Re: One liners

FromMichael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com>
Date2013-12-06 17:10 -0700
SubjectRe: One liners
Message-ID<mailman.3676.1386375040.18130.python-list@python.org>
On 12/06/2013 04:54 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> Does anyone else feel like Python is being dragged too far in the direction
> of long, complex, multiline one-liners?  Or avoiding temporary variables
> with descriptive names?  Or using regex's for everything under the sun?
> 
> What happened to using classes?  What happened to the beautiful emphasis on
> readability?  What happened to debuggability (which is always harder than
> writing things in the first place)?  And what happened to string methods?
> 
> I'm pleased to see Python getting more popular, but it feels like a lot of
> newcomers are trying their best to turn Python into Perl or something,
> culturally speaking.

I have not seen any evidence that this trend of yours is widespread.
The Python code I come across seems pretty normal to me.  Expressive and
readable.  Haven't seen any attempt to turn Python into Perl or that
sort of thing.  And I don't see that culture expressed on the list.
Maybe I'm just blind...

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web