Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #61198
| Date | 2013-12-06 17:10 -0700 |
|---|---|
| From | Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> |
| Subject | Re: One liners |
| References | <CAGGBd_o1TS02cosi+q9YeN5rnWJxe5mU7xtCTuTMZGO0ntF5TA@mail.gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3676.1386375040.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 12/06/2013 04:54 PM, Dan Stromberg wrote: > Does anyone else feel like Python is being dragged too far in the direction > of long, complex, multiline one-liners? Or avoiding temporary variables > with descriptive names? Or using regex's for everything under the sun? > > What happened to using classes? What happened to the beautiful emphasis on > readability? What happened to debuggability (which is always harder than > writing things in the first place)? And what happened to string methods? > > I'm pleased to see Python getting more popular, but it feels like a lot of > newcomers are trying their best to turn Python into Perl or something, > culturally speaking. I have not seen any evidence that this trend of yours is widespread. The Python code I come across seems pretty normal to me. Expressive and readable. Haven't seen any attempt to turn Python into Perl or that sort of thing. And I don't see that culture expressed on the list. Maybe I'm just blind...
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: One liners Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-12-06 17:10 -0700
csiph-web