Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #47506 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-06-09 18:42 -0600 |
| Last post | 2013-06-09 18:42 -0600 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Re-using copyrighted code Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-06-09 18:42 -0600
| From | Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-06-09 18:42 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Re-using copyrighted code |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2945.1370824975.3114.python-list@python.org> |
On 06/09/2013 02:32 PM, Mark Janssen wrote: > PyPi. But if you are *publishing*, there's no court which can > protect your IP afterwards from redistribution, unless you > explicitly *restrict* it. I am not a lawyer, and I haven't read the copyright act in its entirety, nor have I studied all the case law surrounding copyright, but your statement is exactly backwards of anything I've ever read on US copyright. What relevant case law supports this view? It's a very interesting opinion.
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web