Re: Re-using copyrighted code

Date	2013-06-09 18:42 -0600
From	Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com>
Subject	Re: Re-using copyrighted code
References	<kp07qo$r05$1@ger.gmane.org> <51B450C1.5030506@berlin.de> <CAMjeLr8zUAdKKtXy5oyxV=Lo9Nc4iKK9THCmp8FjhYLV0-KiiQ@mail.gmail.com> <51B4DCA2.9000903@gmail.com> <CAMjeLr9LT_pWUWUCsDEiW9vDRc71VdOtDnK+zfb2UtEJwVOqaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.2945.1370824975.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On 06/09/2013 02:32 PM, Mark Janssen wrote:
> PyPi.  But if you are *publishing*, there's no court which can 
> protect your IP afterwards from redistribution, unless you
> explicitly *restrict* it.

I am not a lawyer, and I haven't read the copyright act in its entirety,
nor have I studied all the case law surrounding copyright, but your
statement is exactly backwards of anything I've ever read on US copyright.

What relevant case law supports this view?  It's a very interesting
opinion.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Re-using copyrighted code Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2013-06-09 18:42 -0600

csiph-web