Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #52089 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-08-06 17:46 -0600 |
| Last post | 2013-08-07 00:55 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Enum vs OrderedEnum Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-08-06 17:46 -0600
Re: Enum vs OrderedEnum "Rhodri James" <rhodri@wildebst.demon.co.uk> - 2013-08-07 00:55 +0100
| From | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-08-06 17:46 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Enum vs OrderedEnum |
| Message-ID | <mailman.286.1375832802.1251.python-list@python.org> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Aug 6, 2013 5:15 PM, "Ethan Furman" <ethan@stoneleaf.us> wrote: > > Use the .value attribute instead. You could also substitute self for Environment. It feels more natural and readable to compare the enum instances rather than their value attributes. If I am ordering the values then that seems to imply that the enumeration itself is ordered. So I guess my question is better stated: is there a better way to do this that doesn't involve ordered comparisons at all?
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rhodri James" <rhodri@wildebst.demon.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-08-07 00:55 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <op.w1e53beja8ncjz@gnudebeest> |
| In reply to | #52089 |
On Wed, 07 Aug 2013 00:46:39 +0100, Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> wrote: > On Aug 6, 2013 5:15 PM, "Ethan Furman" <ethan@stoneleaf.us> wrote: >> >> Use the .value attribute instead. You could also substitute self for > Environment. > > It feels more natural and readable to compare the enum instances rather > than their value attributes. If I am ordering the values then that seems > to > imply that the enumeration itself is ordered. So I guess my question is > better stated: is there a better way to do this that doesn't involve > ordered comparisons at all? You could create sets (frozensets?) of standard and hostile environments as class variables. -- Rhodri James *-* Wildebeest Herder to the Masses
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web