Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #52091
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Enum vs OrderedEnum |
| References | <CALwzidm5LSH891oAvK_tzNBY5K-BNS-D970Pa_LLxZXWCb6O9w@mail.gmail.com> <520182F1.2060709@stoneleaf.us> <mailman.286.1375832802.1251.python-list@python.org> |
| From | "Rhodri James" <rhodri@wildebst.demon.co.uk> |
| Organization | The Wildebestiary |
| Message-ID | <op.w1e53beja8ncjz@gnudebeest> (permalink) |
| Date | 2013-08-07 00:55 +0100 |
On Wed, 07 Aug 2013 00:46:39 +0100, Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> wrote: > On Aug 6, 2013 5:15 PM, "Ethan Furman" <ethan@stoneleaf.us> wrote: >> >> Use the .value attribute instead. You could also substitute self for > Environment. > > It feels more natural and readable to compare the enum instances rather > than their value attributes. If I am ordering the values then that seems > to > imply that the enumeration itself is ordered. So I guess my question is > better stated: is there a better way to do this that doesn't involve > ordered comparisons at all? You could create sets (frozensets?) of standard and hostile environments as class variables. -- Rhodri James *-* Wildebeest Herder to the Masses
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Enum vs OrderedEnum Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-08-06 17:46 -0600 Re: Enum vs OrderedEnum "Rhodri James" <rhodri@wildebst.demon.co.uk> - 2013-08-07 00:55 +0100
csiph-web