Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #31862 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Alex Clark <aclark@aclark.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-10-21 16:27 -0400 |
| Last post | 2012-10-21 16:27 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Interest in seeing sh.py in the stdlib Alex Clark <aclark@aclark.net> - 2012-10-21 16:27 -0400
| From | Alex Clark <aclark@aclark.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-10-21 16:27 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: Interest in seeing sh.py in the stdlib |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2603.1350851282.27098.python-list@python.org> |
On 2012-10-21 16:59:16 +0000, Dennis Lee Bieber said: > On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 07:41:52 -0600, Jason Friedman <jason@powerpull.net> > declaimed the following in gmane.comp.python.general: > >> >> Pretty slick. My only concern is portability, are there other >> examples of modules (excepting Win32) that work on some platforms and >> not others? > > Just scan the library reference and you'll find a number of > modules/functions that, even if available on all OS, behave slightly > differently (look up mmap, for example; or readline) I was just getting used to it as PBS :-) Other than really liking your lib… I'm not convinced it would be a good candidate for the stdlib, yet. E.g. Not every good lib belongs in the stdlib. That said, if sh.py continues to gain popularity (akin to e.g. requests) I suspect the "right people" (core developers?) will see it. I'm also curious how that happens, would a PEP be a good place to propose inclusion in the stdlib? -- Alex Clark · https://www.gittip.com/aclark4life/
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web