Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #31862 > unrolled thread

Re: Interest in seeing sh.py in the stdlib

Started byAlex Clark <aclark@aclark.net>
First post2012-10-21 16:27 -0400
Last post2012-10-21 16:27 -0400
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Interest in seeing sh.py in the stdlib Alex Clark <aclark@aclark.net> - 2012-10-21 16:27 -0400

#31862 — Re: Interest in seeing sh.py in the stdlib

FromAlex Clark <aclark@aclark.net>
Date2012-10-21 16:27 -0400
SubjectRe: Interest in seeing sh.py in the stdlib
Message-ID<mailman.2603.1350851282.27098.python-list@python.org>
On 2012-10-21 16:59:16 +0000, Dennis Lee Bieber said:

> On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 07:41:52 -0600, Jason Friedman <jason@powerpull.net>
> declaimed the following in gmane.comp.python.general:
> 
>> 
>> Pretty slick.  My only concern is portability, are there other
>> examples of modules (excepting Win32) that work on some platforms and
>> not others?
> 
> 	Just scan the library reference and you'll find a number of
> modules/functions that, even if available on all OS, behave slightly
> differently (look up mmap, for example; or readline)

I was just getting used to it as PBS :-) Other than really liking your 
lib… I'm not convinced it would be a good candidate for the stdlib, 
yet. E.g. Not every good lib belongs in the stdlib. That said, if sh.py 
continues to gain popularity (akin to e.g. requests) I suspect the 
"right people" (core developers?) will see it. I'm also curious how 
that happens, would a PEP be a good place to propose inclusion in the 
stdlib?


-- 
Alex Clark · https://www.gittip.com/aclark4life/

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web