Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #31862
| From | Alex Clark <aclark@aclark.net> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Interest in seeing sh.py in the stdlib |
| Date | 2012-10-21 16:27 -0400 |
| Organization | ACLARK.NET, LLC |
| References | <CADijH1Xyu+Nzku8C0pR-Wh+eTPvSZmbEMO49YiZBYN+11Fr9xg@mail.gmail.com> <CANy1k1g6h4XAjSUKmOFDsy2Zc+sDMdjc2cynn6=MjkwZnnPsUg@mail.gmail.com> <0v98885ijmgb2lmaj8dp64ri9hvg3dsn4t@invalid.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2603.1350851282.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 2012-10-21 16:59:16 +0000, Dennis Lee Bieber said: > On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 07:41:52 -0600, Jason Friedman <jason@powerpull.net> > declaimed the following in gmane.comp.python.general: > >> >> Pretty slick. My only concern is portability, are there other >> examples of modules (excepting Win32) that work on some platforms and >> not others? > > Just scan the library reference and you'll find a number of > modules/functions that, even if available on all OS, behave slightly > differently (look up mmap, for example; or readline) I was just getting used to it as PBS :-) Other than really liking your lib… I'm not convinced it would be a good candidate for the stdlib, yet. E.g. Not every good lib belongs in the stdlib. That said, if sh.py continues to gain popularity (akin to e.g. requests) I suspect the "right people" (core developers?) will see it. I'm also curious how that happens, would a PEP be a good place to propose inclusion in the stdlib? -- Alex Clark · https://www.gittip.com/aclark4life/
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Interest in seeing sh.py in the stdlib Alex Clark <aclark@aclark.net> - 2012-10-21 16:27 -0400
csiph-web