Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #25169 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Daniel Fetchinson <fetchinson@googlemail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-07-11 09:36 +0200 |
| Last post | 2012-07-11 09:36 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: lambda in list comprehension acting funny Daniel Fetchinson <fetchinson@googlemail.com> - 2012-07-11 09:36 +0200
| From | Daniel Fetchinson <fetchinson@googlemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-07-11 09:36 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: lambda in list comprehension acting funny |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2009.1341992176.4697.python-list@python.org> |
>>> funcs = [ lambda x: x**i for i in range( 5 ) ]
>>> print funcs[0]( 2 )
>>>
>>> This gives me
>>> 16
>>>
>>> When I was excepting
>>> 1
>>>
>>> Does anyone know why?
>
> Just the way Python lambda expressions bind their variable
> references. Inner 'i' references the outer scope's 'i' variable and not
> its value 'at the time the lambda got defined'.
>
>
>> And more importantly, what's the simplest way to achieve the latter? :)
>
> Try giving the lambda a default parameter (they get calculated and
> have their value stored at the time the lambda is defined) like this:
> funcs = [ lambda x, i=i: x**i for i in range( 5 ) ]
Thanks a lot!
I worked around it by
def p(i):
return lambda x: x**i
funcs = [ p(i) for i in range(5) ]
But your variant is nicer (matter of taste of course).
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Psss, psss, put it down! - http://www.cafepress.com/putitdown
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web