Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #25169
| References | <CADjSo4QvTnGKy_ZYOO5qZu3tSKovwAMGjku4L+RXEkYmwXPz4g@mail.gmail.com> <CADjSo4SeuMJOP_iEM9rjVsFtVh84HaVUtPkUCZGKiEdQBWuerw@mail.gmail.com> <jtj8bt$rl4$1@dough.gmane.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-07-11 09:36 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: lambda in list comprehension acting funny |
| From | Daniel Fetchinson <fetchinson@googlemail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2009.1341992176.4697.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
>>> funcs = [ lambda x: x**i for i in range( 5 ) ]
>>> print funcs[0]( 2 )
>>>
>>> This gives me
>>> 16
>>>
>>> When I was excepting
>>> 1
>>>
>>> Does anyone know why?
>
> Just the way Python lambda expressions bind their variable
> references. Inner 'i' references the outer scope's 'i' variable and not
> its value 'at the time the lambda got defined'.
>
>
>> And more importantly, what's the simplest way to achieve the latter? :)
>
> Try giving the lambda a default parameter (they get calculated and
> have their value stored at the time the lambda is defined) like this:
> funcs = [ lambda x, i=i: x**i for i in range( 5 ) ]
Thanks a lot!
I worked around it by
def p(i):
return lambda x: x**i
funcs = [ p(i) for i in range(5) ]
But your variant is nicer (matter of taste of course).
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Psss, psss, put it down! - http://www.cafepress.com/putitdown
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: lambda in list comprehension acting funny Daniel Fetchinson <fetchinson@googlemail.com> - 2012-07-11 09:36 +0200
csiph-web