Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #45541 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-05-19 11:11 +1000 |
| Last post | 2013-05-19 11:11 +1000 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: mutable ints: I think I have painted myself into a corner Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-19 11:11 +1000
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-05-19 11:11 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: mutable ints: I think I have painted myself into a corner |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1827.1368925919.3114.python-list@python.org> |
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> wrote: > Before I toss this approach and retreat to my former "object" > technique, does anyone see a way forward to modify an int subclass > instance in place? (That doesn't break math, preferably; I don't > do arithmetic with these things but they are, after all, ints...) > Why is it an int subclass? Because there are places where you want to use it as though it were an int? It might be easier to render those, instead, eg by creating a __int__ method. (Or is it "an __int__ method"? Not sure.) ChrisA
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web