Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #45541
| References | <20130519002629.GA14025@cskk.homeip.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-05-19 11:11 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: mutable ints: I think I have painted myself into a corner |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1827.1368925919.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 10:26 AM, Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> wrote: > Before I toss this approach and retreat to my former "object" > technique, does anyone see a way forward to modify an int subclass > instance in place? (That doesn't break math, preferably; I don't > do arithmetic with these things but they are, after all, ints...) > Why is it an int subclass? Because there are places where you want to use it as though it were an int? It might be easier to render those, instead, eg by creating a __int__ method. (Or is it "an __int__ method"? Not sure.) ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: mutable ints: I think I have painted myself into a corner Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-05-19 11:11 +1000
csiph-web