Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #10793 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-08-03 11:33 +0200 |
| Last post | 2011-08-03 11:33 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Early binding as an option Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2011-08-03 11:33 +0200
| From | Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-08-03 11:33 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Early binding as an option |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1826.1312364022.1164.python-list@python.org> |
Chris Angelico, 03.08.2011 00:08: > So... Would this potentially produce wrong results? Would it be of any > use, or would its benefit be only valued in times when the whole > function needs to be redone in C? Note that, in most cases, you do not need to "redo the whole function in C". You can just use Cython to compile it, thus leaving it in Python syntax and keeping up Python semantics, unless you decide to explicitly divert from them in favour of optimisations. Stefan
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web