Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #10793 > unrolled thread

Re: Early binding as an option

Started byStefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de>
First post2011-08-03 11:33 +0200
Last post2011-08-03 11:33 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Early binding as an option Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2011-08-03 11:33 +0200

#10793 — Re: Early binding as an option

FromStefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de>
Date2011-08-03 11:33 +0200
SubjectRe: Early binding as an option
Message-ID<mailman.1826.1312364022.1164.python-list@python.org>
Chris Angelico, 03.08.2011 00:08:
> So... Would this potentially produce wrong results? Would it be of any
> use, or would its benefit be only valued in times when the whole
> function needs to be redone in C?

Note that, in most cases, you do not need to "redo the whole function in 
C". You can just use Cython to compile it, thus leaving it in Python syntax 
and keeping up Python semantics, unless you decide to explicitly divert 
from them in favour of optimisations.

Stefan

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web