Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #10793
| From | Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Early binding as an option |
| Date | 2011-08-03 11:33 +0200 |
| References | <CAPTjJmpWN1Tq-46UoHjh_-q9ahkivTWmLJR3_eF9iThHwXQnhA@mail.gmail.com> <j19mbp$985$1@dough.gmane.org> <CAPTjJmr8mjYKTYu9EdKc-QRaFfSwH0rbVdAhnW-ysfvOZujJqQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1826.1312364022.1164.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
Chris Angelico, 03.08.2011 00:08: > So... Would this potentially produce wrong results? Would it be of any > use, or would its benefit be only valued in times when the whole > function needs to be redone in C? Note that, in most cases, you do not need to "redo the whole function in C". You can just use Cython to compile it, thus leaving it in Python syntax and keeping up Python semantics, unless you decide to explicitly divert from them in favour of optimisations. Stefan
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Early binding as an option Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2011-08-03 11:33 +0200
csiph-web