Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #45230 > unrolled thread

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

Started byFábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com>
First post2013-05-13 09:29 +0100
Last post2013-05-13 09:29 +0100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2 Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-05-13 09:29 +0100

#45230 — Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

FromFábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com>
Date2013-05-13 09:29 +0100
SubjectRe: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2
Message-ID<mailman.1618.1368433767.3114.python-list@python.org>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Sounds a lot like reddit threads.
On 13 May 2013 08:17, "Mark Janssen" <dreamingforward@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com>
> wrote:
> > I've never understood why people use that site: the pages end up being
> > unintelligible cocktail-party noise-scapes with no hope of understanding
> who
> > is saying what, or in response to whom.
>
> You're very right.  But that is what has made it sort of a test-bed
> for internet collaboration.   The project I'm working on is aimed to
> solve that problem and take the Wiki philosophy to its next or even
> ultimate level.  By adding a "natural" per-revision voting and
> user-ranking it can clear up all the noise and scale to the whole
> internet itself.  ....But no one around here seem to think its
> possible.
> --
> MarkJ
> Tacoma, Washington
> --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web