Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2

References	(2 earlier) <CAMjeLr8+pr12+0mN0SOrtg9ZTkNq=PiqxWyqB8CxpJ0BT=sxJA@mail.gmail.com> <CAMjeLr9OSD4B-2NHNra=Acyj1h0g8VLOVwjFFm5c35TX+Vu5SA@mail.gmail.com> <CAMjeLr9PxwF6hDheJ+zJPYaX9KYJMUeVxxZk31TTeA+9N0Bz_Q@mail.gmail.com> <518FCF02.9090307@nedbatchelder.com> <CAMjeLr8qY6fgdwQChcuJSojUrQQciiLO_F4uDvi6LFsA9uvtMw@mail.gmail.com>
Date	2013-05-13 09:29 +0100
Subject	Re: Message passing syntax for objects \| OOPv2
From	Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.1618.1368433767.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Sounds a lot like reddit threads.
On 13 May 2013 08:17, "Mark Janssen" <dreamingforward@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com>
> wrote:
> > I've never understood why people use that site: the pages end up being
> > unintelligible cocktail-party noise-scapes with no hope of understanding
> who
> > is saying what, or in response to whom.
>
> You're very right.  But that is what has made it sort of a test-bed
> for internet collaboration.   The project I'm working on is aimed to
> solve that problem and take the Wiki philosophy to its next or even
> ultimate level.  By adding a "natural" per-revision voting and
> user-ranking it can clear up all the noise and scale to the whole
> internet itself.  ....But no one around here seem to think its
> possible.
> --
> MarkJ
> Tacoma, Washington
> --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Message passing syntax for objects | OOPv2 Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-05-13 09:29 +0100

csiph-web