Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #76775 > unrolled thread
| Started by | dieter <dieter@handshake.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-08-22 08:12 +0200 |
| Last post | 2014-08-22 08:12 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Python vs C++ dieter <dieter@handshake.de> - 2014-08-22 08:12 +0200
| From | dieter <dieter@handshake.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-08-22 08:12 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: Python vs C++ |
| Message-ID | <mailman.13273.1408687996.18130.python-list@python.org> |
David Palao <dpalao.python@gmail.com> writes:
> Why to use C++ instead of python?
Likely, you would not use Python to implement most parts of an
operating system (where, for efficiency reasons, some parts
are even implemented in an assembler language).
I can imagine that the GNU compiler developers, too, had good
reasons to implement them in C rather than a scripting language.
It makes a huge difference whether you wait one or several hours
before a large system is built.
"firefox", too, seems to be implemented in C/C++. There, too, I
see good reasons:
* it is nice when your pages are rendered quickly
* "firefox" depends on lots of external libraries, all of them
with C/C++ interfaces; while is is possible to create
Python bindings for them, this is quite some work
* as it is, "firefox" is a huge "memory eater"; one might
fear that things would be worse if implemented in a
higher level language (with everything on the heap).
Though, the fear might not be justified.
All these examples are really large projects. I like Python a lot
for smaller projects.
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web