Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #76775
| From | dieter <dieter@handshake.de> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Python vs C++ |
| Date | 2014-08-22 08:12 +0200 |
| References | <CAKUKWzmnnrpm-9SVNAFu3G9vYf2w0ewAhnGeOge8B2NsDujamQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.13273.1408687996.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
David Palao <dpalao.python@gmail.com> writes:
> Why to use C++ instead of python?
Likely, you would not use Python to implement most parts of an
operating system (where, for efficiency reasons, some parts
are even implemented in an assembler language).
I can imagine that the GNU compiler developers, too, had good
reasons to implement them in C rather than a scripting language.
It makes a huge difference whether you wait one or several hours
before a large system is built.
"firefox", too, seems to be implemented in C/C++. There, too, I
see good reasons:
* it is nice when your pages are rendered quickly
* "firefox" depends on lots of external libraries, all of them
with C/C++ interfaces; while is is possible to create
Python bindings for them, this is quite some work
* as it is, "firefox" is a huge "memory eater"; one might
fear that things would be worse if implemented in a
higher level language (with everything on the heap).
Though, the fear might not be justified.
All these examples are really large projects. I like Python a lot
for smaller projects.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Python vs C++ dieter <dieter@handshake.de> - 2014-08-22 08:12 +0200
csiph-web