Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #76446 > unrolled thread

Re: Why Python 4.0 won't be like Python 3.0

Started byChris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
First post2014-08-18 12:32 +1000
Last post2014-08-18 01:30 -0700
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Why Python 4.0 won't be like Python 3.0 Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-18 12:32 +1000
    Re: Why Python 4.0 won't be like Python 3.0 wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2014-08-18 01:30 -0700

#76446 — Re: Why Python 4.0 won't be like Python 3.0

FromChris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Date2014-08-18 12:32 +1000
SubjectRe: Why Python 4.0 won't be like Python 3.0
Message-ID<mailman.13079.1408329145.18130.python-list@python.org>
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Redge @ Versalytics.com
<versalytics@gmail.com> wrote:
> Definitely a relief. After delving into Python only a few short months ago, everything I was reading suggested 2.x.x. When I switched to another book to continue with my studies, some of the code wasn't working ... welcome to 3.x.x.  Needless to say, I'm using 3.4.1 exclusively today unless something bizarre requires me to do otherwise.
>

Good move. You should be able to upgrade to 3.4.x safely, and 3.5 fairly safely.

Eventually, books about Python 3 will be the more easily found, and
you won't have this kind of confusion.

ChrisA

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#76462

Fromwxjmfauth@gmail.com
Date2014-08-18 01:30 -0700
Message-ID<99ae1b64-b6cd-42c1-9dba-d98eb710418e@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#76446
Le lundi 18 août 2014 04:32:23 UTC+2, Chris Angelico a écrit :
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Redge @ Versalytics.com
> 
> <versalytics@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Definitely a relief. After delving into Python only a few short months ago, everything I was reading suggested 2.x.x. When I switched to another book to continue with my studies, some of the code wasn't working ... welcome to 3.x.x.  Needless to say, I'm using 3.4.1 exclusively today unless something bizarre requires me to do otherwise.
> 
> >
> 
> 
> 
> Good move. You should be able to upgrade to 3.4.x safely, and 3.5 fairly safely.
> 
> 
> 
> Eventually, books about Python 3 will be the more easily found, and
> 
> you won't have this kind of confusion.
> 
> 
> 
> ChrisA

LibreOffice contains a Python 3 scripting engine.
Just for the fun, I take a look with Writer.
It simply fails on a valid string (as I expected).
However, LibreOffice does not crash (or may not crash).
I do no know how these "errors" are intercepted.
Unfortunately, that's not the case in Python GUI wrappers.

jmf

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web